Friday, December 25, 2009

Location, Location, Location, Live? Was it just me or were the presenters simply not up to it?

The very few actual LIVE segments seemed very poor, very few for a TV show that pronounced itsself LIVE, they seemed to drop the ball on every live link, and Kirstie Allsopp almost reading a presumably rude e-mail live on air was just and example of the amateur statis of the show.



I'm not knocking the normal show, (or even the results) just the LIVE version.



About ten mins of it was actually live, and it seemed to me about as painful to watch as the 1989, Sam Fox BRIT Awards with Mick Fleetwood



Location, Location, Location, Live? Was it just me or were the presenters simply not up to it?

In Kirstie and Phil's defence they did say right at the beginning that they had never done a live show before and that anything could happen. Maybe they will get better with practice! As to it being a live show, yes I said this to my other half that it was supposed to be live but the majority wasn't but I guess there was no way they could present all those locations live - it had to be pre-recorded. Maybe they shouldn't have advertised it as a live show.....



Location, Location, Location, Live? Was it just me or were the presenters simply not up to it?

Well- DON'T WATCH IT.



Location, Location, Location, Live? Was it just me or were the presenters simply not up to it?

they are good presenters for pre recorded work but live was a bit dodgy got to admit, it was a bit like watchin the brits with sam fox a few years ago.



Location, Location, Location, Live? Was it just me or were the presenters simply not up to it?

i did,nt see but as all there programme.s are recorded i assume they are just not used to live t v and live link,s etc

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
web hosting talk